Stephen Carlstrom, Jr. v. Charles W. Callahan
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEPHEN P. CARLSTROM, Jr., No. 17-55594
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:16-cv-01297-JVS-KES v.
CHARLES W. CALLAHAN, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Stephen Carlstrom, Jr. appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 habeas petition as untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death
Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291
and affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Under AEDPA, a state prisoner has one year from the date his…