Stephen Carlstrom, Jr. v. Charles W. Callahan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202517-55594California789 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN P. CARLSTROM, Jr., No. 17-55594

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:16-cv-01297-JVS-KES v.

CHARLES W. CALLAHAN, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Stephen Carlstrom, Jr. appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 habeas petition as untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

and affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Under AEDPA, a state prisoner has one year from the date his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.