Mateo-Diego

Mateo-Diego v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202523-955California698 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EULALIA MATEO-DIEGO; No. 23-955

D. P-M.,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A203-495-792

A203-495-793

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of a Final Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 9, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BADE and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and KANE,*** District Judge.

Eulalia Mateo-Diego and her minor son, natives and citizens of Guatemala,

(“Petitioners”) petition for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Yvette Kane, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal of the order of the Immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.