Quintanilla-Rivas
Quintanilla-Rivas v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202524-2293California1,111 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 15 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERTO ANTONIO QUINTANILLA- No. 24-2293
RIVAS; HILDA LISSETH CANJURA-
MANCIA; J.M.G.; D.A.Q., Agency Nos.
A220-605-172
Petitioners, A220-939-890
A220-939-891
v. A220-939-892
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 11, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Roberto Antonio Quintanilla-Rivas, his partner Hilda Lisseth Canjura-
Mancia, their minor son D.A.Q., and Ms. Canjura-Mancia’s minor son J.M.G., all
natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals’ (“the Board”)…