Quintanilla-Rivas

Quintanilla-Rivas v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202524-2293California1,111 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 15 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO ANTONIO QUINTANILLA- No. 24-2293

RIVAS; HILDA LISSETH CANJURA-

MANCIA; J.M.G.; D.A.Q., Agency Nos.

A220-605-172

Petitioners, A220-939-890

A220-939-891

v. A220-939-892

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Roberto Antonio Quintanilla-Rivas, his partner Hilda Lisseth Canjura-

Mancia, their minor son D.A.Q., and Ms. Canjura-Mancia’s minor son J.M.G., all

natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals’ (“the Board”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.