Pena-Cardona
Pena-Cardona v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202524-2922California539 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 15 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAFAEL PENA-CARDONA; I.P.G., No. 24-2922
Petitioners, Agency Nos.
A220-960-372
v. A220-960-373
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 11, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Rafael Antonio Pena-Cardona and his minor child petition for
review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming an
Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and
protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the…