Pena-Cardona

Pena-Cardona v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202524-2922California539 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 15 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAFAEL PENA-CARDONA; I.P.G., No. 24-2922

Petitioners, Agency Nos.

A220-960-372

v. A220-960-373

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Rafael Antonio Pena-Cardona and his minor child petition for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming an

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.