Coleman

Coleman v. Newsom

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202524-3707California882 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RALPH COLEMAN; JORGE ANDRADE No. 24-3707 RICO; PETER COCKCROFT; ERNESTO D.C. No. VENEGAS; JULIO GARZA, 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-DB Plaintiffs - Appellees,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

GAVIN NEWSOM; JEFF

MACOMBER; JOE

STEPHENSHAW; STEPHANIE

CLENDENIN; AMAR MEHTA; DIANA

TOCHE,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 6, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: TASHIMA, RAWLINSON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Gavin Newsom and the other State Defendants (collectively, the State)

appeal the district court’s order holding that treatment for class members’

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. personality disorders is required by the Eighth Amendment. Because the district

court’s order was final, we have jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.