Patrick Missud, I v. San Francisco Superior Court

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 201312-17622California300 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 19 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK ALEXANDRE MISSUD, I, No. 12-17622

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:12-cv-03117-WHA

v.

MEMORANDUM *

SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT;

et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 14, 2013 **

Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Patrick Alexandre Missud, I, appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his action alleging that judges, courts, and state agencies

violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). other laws. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse

of discretion the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.