Maldonado

Maldonado v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20251:24-cv-00102California374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARISSA MALDONADO, as representative Case No. 1:24-cv-00102-KES-SAB of the estate of Aimee Nicole Doughty, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE

Plaintiffs, TO AMEND

v. (ECF No. 42)

CITY OF FRESNO, et al., Defendants.

16 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Defendants 17 have filed a non-opposition to the motion (ECF No. 47), and therefore, the Court finds it 18 appropriate to rule of the motion without oral argument. L.R. 230(g). 19 Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, leave to amend shall be freely 20 given when justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). “In the absence of . . . undue delay, bad 21 faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by 22 amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of 23 the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.—the leave sought should . . . be ‘freely given.’” 24 Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.