Erik Martinez Gutierrez v. B. Birkholz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20252:25-cv-01998California282 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-CV-01998-SVW (SK) Date: April 15, 2025 Title Erik Martinez Gutierrez v. B. Birkholz

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner filed habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on March 3, 2025. (ECF 1). But at the time of this filing, Petitioner did not pay the required $5 filing fee or complete a Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support (Form CV-60P). The Court previously warned Petitioner that his petition may be dismissed if he did not pay this fee or request to proceed without prepayment by April 7, 2025. (See ECF 2). Yet Petitioner has not responded to this deficiency notice. Petitioner is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failing to pay or apply for the waiver of the filing fee within 14…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.