(PC) Young v. Corcoran State Prison Visiting Staff

DISCUSSION

18 On October 29, 2024, the Court found that Plaintiff’s first amended complaint stated a 19 cognizable claim for improper denial of regular visitation privileges with his family while 20 detained at Corcoran State Prison against the Doe Defendant(s). (ECF No. 16.) 21 The Court allowed Plaintiff to issue a subpoena to Corcoran State Prison in order to 22 identify the Doe Defendants described in the operative complaint. (ECF No. 15, 16.) On 23 November 15, 2024, Plaintiff completed and returned the subpoena. (ECF No. 17.) 24 On November 19, 2024, the Court directed service of the subpoena by the United States 25 Marshal on the Litigation Coordinator at Corcoran State Prison providing a thirty-day response 26 deadline.1 (ECF No. 18.) The Court directed that any response and/or responsive documents be 27 1 On November 26, 2024, a proof of personal service of the subpoena was returned by the United States Marshal. produced to Plaintiff at his address of record. (Id. at 2.) On February 28, 2025, Plaintiff informed the Court that he had not received any information from the litigation coordinator at Corcoran in response to the served subpoena. (ECF 4 …