Gross

Gross v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20255:24-cv-02069California1,594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TERRY GROSS, Case No. 24-cv-02069-EJD (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE APRIL 3, 2025

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE BREEN

TESTIMONY

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 12 Defendants.

13 The parties ask the Court to resolve a dispute regarding application of the the attorney work product doctrine. Dkt. No. 34. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). As explained below, the Court concludes that Mr. Breen may be deposed regarding the Breen report, which has already been disclosed, and factual information regarding the investigation he conducted. I. BACKGROUND The background to this dispute is described in detail in the Court’s prior order and will not be repeated here. See Dkt. No. 31. As the parties acknowledge, in that order, the Court concluded that the Breen report is not entitled to protection as an attorney-client…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.