Graham

Compeer Financial, ACA v. Graham

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20251:25-cv-00049California830 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

17 On April 10, 2025, Plaintiffs Compeer Financial, ACA; Compeer Financial, PCA; and Compeer Financial, FLCA (collectively “Plaintiffs”), filed their Amended Complaint against Defendants Michael Graham; Cynthia Graham; Dennis Morgan; Kristi Iness; and JD Investments (collectively “Defendants”) alleging theft of funds belonging to Plaintiffs. (Doc. 46.) Plaintiffs also filed an “Notice of Request to Seal and Redact Documents,” that same day. (Doc. 45.) Plaintiffs seek leave to seal Exhibits AA and BB to the Amended Complaint and to redact portions of the Amended Complaint derived from those exhibits. (Id.) The request is unopposed. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ unopposed request to redact these documents will be granted. II. DISCUSSION “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.