(PC) Moten v. Office of the Inspector General

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20251:25-cv-00188California1,114 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 SHARROD MOTEN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00188-KES-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS THIS ACTION WITHOUT v. PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO

GENERAL, et al., COMPLY WITH COURT’S ORDERS

Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,

DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

16 17 Plaintiff Sharrod Moten is confined at Kern Valley State Prison and is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff sues 19 “Office of the Inspector General, Ombudsman Tammy Falconer, and Kern Valley State Prison, alleging a deliberate conspiracy amongst Defendants to obstruct justice, shield themselves from 21 liability,” and violate Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. (See generally ECF No. 1). For reasons stated below, the Court recommends that this case be dismissed without 23 prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court’s orders. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.