(SS) Celillo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20252:24-cv-01031California2,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE DIANA CELILLO, No. 2:24-cv-01031-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying applications for Disability Income Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), respectively. The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction for all purposes in this matter, including entry of final judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and grant the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, born in 1968, applied on November 16, 2020 for DIB and SSI, alleging disability beginning April 2, 2019. Administrative Transcript (“AT”) 23. Plaintiff alleges she was unable to work due to multiple physical and mental conditions,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.