Shaffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMIE STEPHENS, No. 2:24-cv-1785 DC CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. SHAFFER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On March 3, 2025, the Court recommended that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied, and plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 11.) On March 10, 2025, plaintiff filed objections, and the findings and recommendations are now before the district court. On April 9, 2025, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Emergency Request,” citing Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 15.) However, plaintiff’s request is premature. The district court has not yet ruled on the findings and recommendations, so there is no order to reconsider. Therefore, plaintiff’s request is denied. Further, plaintiff appears to seek reconsideration of the finding that plaintiff did not qualify for the imminent…