Bailey
Bailey v. County of Stanislaus
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DAVID MICHAEL BAILEY, No. 2:24-cv-03231-JAM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; DEPUTY
LARSON; DEPUTY ROSE; DEPUTY
GARCIA; CITY OF TURLOCK; DOE ONE; and DOES 2-10, inclusive. Defendants. 16 Before the Court is County of Stanislaus, Deputy Larson, Deputy Rose, and Deputy Garcia’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss David Bailey’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint for failure to state a claim. See Mot., ECF No. 16. Defendant City of Turlock does not join in the present motion and has separately answered the Complaint. See ECF No. 13. Plaintiff opposed Defendants’ motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 18. Defendants replied. See Reply, ECF No. 19. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted with leave to amend.1
1This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for April 22, 2025. 1…