Bondi

Espinoza Juarez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202523-4402California1,094 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELIPE DE JESUS ESPINOZA No. 23-4402 JUAREZ; PATRICIA ESMERALDA Agency Nos.

CRUZ ALFARO; D.D.J.E.C.; A.P.E.C., A220-604-592

A220-955-433

Petitioners,

A220-955-434

A220-955-435

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 24, 2025 Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and KENDALL, District Judge.**

Felipe de Jesus Espinoza Juarez (“Espinoza Juarez”); his spouse, Patricia

Esmeralda Cruz Alfaro (“Cruz Alfaro”); and their two minor children (collectively,

“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of El Salvador, appeal the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Virginia M. Kendall, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.