Bondi

Torres Vargas v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202524-2840California767 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OMAR TORRES VARGAS, No. 24-2840 Agency No. Petitioner, A202-151-795 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 10, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Omar Torres Vargas seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order

denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252 and deny the petition.

“Where, as here, the BIA agrees with the IJ decision and also adds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.