Romero
Hernandez Richter v. Romero
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202524-1290California909 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FERNANDO HERNANDEZ RICHTER, No. 24-1290
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05513-DGC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CHRISTOPHER ROMERO, Corrections Officer; JULIE BOWERS, Corrections Officer,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 3, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Fernando Hernandez Richter (“Richter”) was assaulted
by other inmates while in the custody of the Arizona Department of Corrections,
Rehabilitation, and Reentry (“ADCRR”). He brought this action under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 alleging, inter alia, that Defendants-Appellees Christopher Romero and
Julie Bowers violated the Eighth Amendment by breaching their duty as ADCRR
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule…