Combest
Combest v. Dudek
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202524-4655California317 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VIRGINIA COMBEST, No. 24-4655 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00999-MTL v.
MEMORANDUM*
LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 9, 2025 San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER, S.R. THOMAS, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Claimant Virginia Combest appeals from the district court’s order affirming
the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of disability insurance benefits and
supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand.
The ALJ found that objective medical evidence showed that Combest
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. suffered from several medically determinable…