Combest

Combest v. Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 202524-4655California317 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VIRGINIA COMBEST, No. 24-4655 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00999-MTL v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 9, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, S.R. THOMAS, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Claimant Virginia Combest appeals from the district court’s order affirming

the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of disability insurance benefits and

supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand.

The ALJ found that objective medical evidence showed that Combest

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. suffered from several medically determinable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.