RG Abrams Insurance v. The Law Office of C.R. Abrams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

RG ABRAMS INSURANCE et al., Case No. CV 21-00194-DFM

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MOTION FOR

PERMANENT INJUNCTION (DKT.

v. 522) AND MOTION FOR FINDINGS

OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF

THE LAW OFFICES OF CR LAW (DKT. 523)

ABRAMS et al.,

Defendants.

Late last year, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Robin Goltsman. Before the Court are two post-trial motions: (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for a Permanent Injunction, and (2) Defendants and Counterclaimants’ Motion for Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. See Dkts. 522, 523. The Court heard argument on these motions on February 11, 2025. See Dkt. 538. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are DENIED.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. The Parties’ Claims and Counterclaims and a Change of Venue This long litigation saga began in February 2020, when Goltsman and RG Abrams Insurance filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. See Dkt. 1. The complaint alleged eleven claims against Goltsman’s former business partners and associates: the Law…