(SS) Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20251:21-cv-00292California2,902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

4 Plaintiff applied for Title II Disability Insurance Benefits on September 12, 2016, alleging that 5 she became disabled on August 23, 2016. AR 375-76. The claim was denied initially on November 6 15, 2016, and on reconsideration on April 7, 2017. AR 274-85, 286-300. Plaintiff requested a hearing 7 before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) and ALJ Shiva Bozarth. held a hearing on January 9, 8 2019. AR 224-273. ALJ Bozarth issued an order denying benefits on the basis that Plaintiff was not 9 disabled on May 1, 2019. AR 34-55. Plaintiff sought review of the ALJ’s decision, which the 10 Appeals Council denied. AR 9-14. This appeal followed. 11 Medical Record 12 The relevant medical record was reviewed by the Court and will be referenced below as 13 necessary to this Court’s decision. 14 The ALJ’s Decision 15 Using the Social Security Administration’s five-step sequential evaluation process, the ALJ 16 determined that Plaintiff was not disabled under the Social Security Act. AR 34-55. Specifically, the 17 ALJ found that Plaintiff had not engaged in substantial gainful activity since the alleged onset date of 18 August 23, 2016. AR 39. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.