Chavez

(PC) Haygood v. Chavez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20251:24-cv-00239California799 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 HASSAUN HAYGOOD, 1:24-cv-000239-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL RULES

DANNY CHAVEZ, 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendant.

15 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment free exercise of religion claim against Defendant Chavez. I. INTRODUCTION On March 6, 2025, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (Doc. 33.) On March 17, 2025, Defendant Chavez filed a motion to strike, or, alternatively, a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint. (Doc. 34.) Plaintiff has failed to timely respond to Defendant’s motion. II. DISCUSSION The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.