Langenderfer

Langenderfer v. Miller

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20254:24-cv-06526California1,613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS LANGENDERFER, Case No. 24-cv-06526-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 13 ROGER A. MILLER, et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 13. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Pro se Plaintiff Geronimo Thomas Langenderfer filed this case in September 2024 against Defendants Thomas J. Madden, Nicholas Lumbreras, and Roger A. Miller, seeking approximately $8 million for breach of contract. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendants Madden and Miller have moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Dkt. No. 13. II. LEGAL STANDARD Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), a party may move to dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.