Langenderfer
Langenderfer v. Miller
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS LANGENDERFER, Case No. 24-cv-06526-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. No. 13 ROGER A. MILLER, et al., Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 13. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Pro se Plaintiff Geronimo Thomas Langenderfer filed this case in September 2024 against Defendants Thomas J. Madden, Nicholas Lumbreras, and Roger A. Miller, seeking approximately $8 million for breach of contract. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendants Madden and Miller have moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Dkt. No. 13. II. LEGAL STANDARD Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), a party may move to dismiss…