Hazari

Hazari v. County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20255:19-cv-04392California707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 CYRUS HAZARI, Case No. 19-cv-04392-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

UNDER SEAL

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., [Re: ECF No. 90, 92] Defendants.

12 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s administrative motions to file under seal, filed in connection with his motion to set aside order. ECF 90, 92. Defendants did not submit any response to Plaintiff’s motions. Having reviewed Plaintiff’s submissions and applicable sealing law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s requests to seal. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n. (1978)). Consequently, access to motions and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.