Michael Sandoval v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20258:25-cv-00727California1,634 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

Plaintiff Michael Sandoval sued Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Does 1-10 in Orange County Superior Court on April 2, 2025 for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act because Defendant’s website is allegedly inaccessible to blind and visually- impaired consumers such as Plaintiff. See generally Complaint (“Compl.”) (Dkt. 1, Ex.

A).

On April 9, 2025, Defendant removed the action to this Court, asserting federal question and diversity jurisdiction. Notice of Removal (Dkt. 1) (“Not.”), at 1-2. On April 15, 2025, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) which pleads only a violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, limits injunctive relief to no more than

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:25-cv-00727-DOC-DFM Date: April 16, 2025 Page

$50,000, and seeks statutory damages of $4,000 per violation, $4,000 for deterrence, and attorney’s fees. See generally FAC (Dkt. 7).

II. Legal Standard

“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.