Shen
(PC) Uhuru v. Shen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KOHEN DIALLO E. UHURU, No. 2:23-cv-0068 DC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER HANIEL SHEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Prison Rape Elimination Act (“PREA”), 34 U.S.C. §§ 30301-30309; the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (“CRIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq.; the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12203; and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. Plaintiff paid the filing fee in full after the court denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. In screening of the first amended complaint (“FAC”),1 the court found that plaintiff had stated an excessive force claim against defendant T. Fuller, but had not stated any claims against defendants Shen, Gonzalez, Associate Warden Johnson, Aguilar, Meeker, C. Johnson, Dunkle, Lao, and Does 10-…