(PC) Petillo v. Lynch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENNIS PETILLO, JR., Case No. 2:24-cv-0421-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JEFF LYNCH, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this action against various supervisory defendants at California State Prison – Sacramento. ECF No. 13. I screened his original complaint and dismissed it because it was incomprehensible, and I also granted his application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff filed amended complaints, ECF Nos. 10 & 11, which I also screened and dismissed because they were unintelligible. ECF No. 12 at 3. After review of plaintiff’s second amended complaint, I recommend that it be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. 24 1 I also informed plaintiff that he was a “three-striker” under the Prison Litigation Reform 25 Act, and instructed him to explain why, despite this status, he should be allowed to proceed in forma…