(HC) Shove v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THEODORE CHURCHILL SHOVE Sr., Case No. 2:24-cv-1976-JDP (P) Petitioner, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner, brought this action under section 2254. ECF No. 1. Petitioner has twice brought petitions that appear time-barred and whose substance is unintelligible. I have twice given him leave to amend, ECF Nos. 28 & 45, and he has filed a third petition, ECF No. 47. Like its predecessors, the third petition is incomprehensible and apparently time-barred. Accordingly, I now recommend that it be dismissed without leave to amend. Petitioner has also filed numerous other motions, ECF Nos. 46, 48, 49, 51, 52, 54, 56, & 57, which I will deny as moot. If these recommendations are not adopted, petitioner may renew them. Screening Order The petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. …