Davis

(PS) Davis v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20252:25-cv-00555California547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEPHANIE ELAIN DAVIS, No. 2:25-cv-00555 DAD CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHAUN WILLIAM DAVIS, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The federal in forma pauperis statute authorizes federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s brief and conclusory allegations do not state a federal claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.