Bondi

Valdovinos Tafolla v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 202523-2029California942 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA CRUZ VALDOVINOS No. 23-2029

TAFOLLA; KEVIN ALEXIS RAMIREZ

VALDOVINOS, Agency Nos. A215-815-396

A215-815-397

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Maria Cruz Valdovinos Tafolla and her minor son, Kevin Alexis

Ramirez Valdovinos, both citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a decision by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal of an

Immigration Judge’s decision denying Valdovinos Tafolla’s application for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.