Morales-Valladares

Morales-Valladares v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 202523-1742California1,099 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA ALEJANDRA MORALES- No. 23-1742 VALLADARES; EDISON ALVARADO- Agency Nos.

MORALES, A209-829-297

A209-829-298

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 7, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Maria Morales-Valladares (“Morales”) and Edison Alvarado-Morales

(“Alvarado-Morales”), natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). from an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying their petitions for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.