Brock Keefe v. Leland Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 202523-35384California453 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BROCK B. KEEFE, No. 23-35384

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00107-CWD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Candy W. Dale, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2025**

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Brock B. Keefe appeals pro se from the district court’s affirmance of the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability insurance

benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We review the district court’s order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirming the ALJ’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.