People v. Saenz CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
In May 2019, under the terms of his plea agreement, defendant pled guilty to
making a criminal threat (§ 422), assault likely to cause great bodily injury (§ 245), and
possession of heroin in county jail (§ 4573.6). Defendant also admitted two prior prison
commitments. (§ 667, subd. (b).) Consistent with defendant’s plea terms, the trial court
sentenced defendant to an aggregate prison term of four years eight months. As relevant
here, the court imposed but stayed execution of one-year enhanced terms for each of
defendant’s prison priors.
In December 2023 the trial court considered defendant’s eligibility for recall of his
sentence and resentencing under section 1172.75. The court found he was ineligible.
Defendant’s case was one of dozens considered together that day by stipulation of
the parties, pursuant to which the court operated under the assumption that each
defendant’s “one-year prior state prison enhancement(s) had been ‘stayed.’ ”
In reaching the conclusion defendant was ineligible for relief, the court noted
expressly that it had considered several recently decided cases: People v. Saldana (2023)
97 Cal.App.5th 1270 (Saldana), review granted…