People v. Moreno CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 17, 2025B338007California1,052 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/17/25 P. v. Moreno CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B338007

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. NA102184)

EDGARDO ANDRE MORENO

et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

THE COURT:

The trial court resentenced appellants Alfredo Landeros and Edgardo Moreno in accordance with this court’s directions in People v. Shinn et al. (Apr. 27, 2023, B316256, mod. May 17, 2023) [nonpub. opn.]. Before the hearing, appellants requested a new trial, citing the Racial Justice Act (RJA). (Pen. Code, § 745.)1 The court found that appellants did not show a prima facie case of discrimination under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.