People v. Arias CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 17, 2025B332935MCalifornia1,690 words

Opinion

Opinion

discussion exceeded the scope of our request for

2 supplemental briefing and accordingly provided the People no opportunity to respond.

* * *

There is no change in the judgment.

Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.

——————————————————————————————

HOFFSTADT, P. J. MOOR, J. KIM, J.

3 Filed 4/10/25 P. v. Arias CA2/5 (unmodified opinion)

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE, B332935

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA017836) v.

BULMARO MAGANA ARIAS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Laura L. Laesecke, Judge. Affirmed, and remanded with directions.

Jonathan E. Demson, under appointment by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.