Hernandez

Hernandez v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20253:21-cv-00225California859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON H., Case No.: 21-cv-0225-SBC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT v. PREJUDICE JOINT MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE of Social Security,

EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT,

Defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. § 1920 [ECF NO. 26] 17 18 Presently before the Court is a joint motion for the award of attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (“EAJA”) and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. (ECF No. 26.) For the reasons set forth below, the joint motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND On December 8, 2023, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.