Hudson

Hudson v. Andes

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20253:24-cv-05443California891 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TORIANO GERMAINE HUDSON Case No. 24-cv-05443-EMC (AX4560), 8 Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v.

CHANCE ANDES,

11 Respondent.

13 Petitioner Toriano G. Hudson, a California state prisoner, brings this petition for writ of 14 habeas corpus. For the reasons outlined below, the petition is dismissed without prejudice.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

16 Hudson contends that on May 2, 2024, he was resentenced from 35-to-life to 13 years and 17 4 months due to the San Quentin transfer lawsuits. Dkt. No. 1 at 5. Shortly thereafter, Hudson 18 began receiving “bogus RVRs” for refusing cellmates. Id. As a result of the various rules violations, Hudson’s release date was moved from July 30, 2024, to December 17, 2024. Id. 20 Hudson contends that he refused cellmates due to the risk of COVID-19, which he contracted in 21 2020. Id. at 5-6.

LEGAL STANDARD

23 A district court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus on “behalf of a person in 24 custody pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.