Cooley
Smith v. Cooley
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20251:25-cv-00421California2,333 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00421-KES-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
REVISE PLAINTIFF’S NAME FROM
v. “CANDICE” TO “CANDACE” ON THE
DOCKET
KATHY COOLEY, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
Defendants. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND
WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, FOR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE 8 OF
THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE AND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-
MATTER JURISDICTION
(ECF No. 1)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY (30) DAYS
21 Plaintiff Candace Smith proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. (ECF Nos. 1, 3). Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on April 10, 2025, appears to seek to hold Defendants Kathy Cooley, California Lottery, and Vons liable for, among…