Cooley

Smith v. Cooley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20251:25-cv-00421California2,333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00421-KES-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

REVISE PLAINTIFF’S NAME FROM

v. “CANDICE” TO “CANDACE” ON THE

DOCKET

KATHY COOLEY, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

Defendants. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE 8 OF

THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE AND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-

MATTER JURISDICTION

(ECF No. 1)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS

21 Plaintiff Candace Smith proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. (ECF Nos. 1, 3). Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on April 10, 2025, appears to seek to hold Defendants Kathy Cooley, California Lottery, and Vons liable for, among…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.