Beulah

Beulah v. Cox

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20255:24-cv-09478California1,789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARYL ANTHONY BEULAH,

11 Case No. 24-cv-09478 BLF Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

v.

14 KYLE COX, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against staff at the San Quentin Rehabilitation Center (“SQRC”). The signed complaint filed on January 9, 2025, is the operative complaint in this action. Dkt. No. 4. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be addressed in a separate order. 22 DISCUSSION I. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.