Nick McKissick v. ByteDance, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20252:25-cv-03118California1,099 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Apr 11 2025 Mark B. Busby

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND

FILED

CLERK,U.S. DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL 4/3/2025

on □ MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Be ery 2:25-ml-03144-GW-RAQ.

IN RE: TIKTOK, INC., MINOR

PRIVACY LITIGATION MDL No. 3144

TRANSFER ORDER

Before the Panel: Plaintiff in the Northern District of California McKissick action moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of California or, alternatively, to include the actions in MDL No. 3047 — In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, which is also pending in that district. Alternatively, he suggests centralization in the Southern District of Florida. This litigation consists of six actions pending in five districts, as listed on Schedule A.! In addition, the parties have informed the Panel of fourteen potentially-related actions pending in eight districts.” Though defendants? and plaintiffs in the consolidated Central District of California actions initially opposed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.