(PS) Darosa v. Lowes Home Improvement

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20252:23-cv-00123California1,899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JONATHAN DAROSA No. 2:23-cv-00123-WBS-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT,

14 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action. See ECF No. 19 (granting counsel’s motion to withdraw). This matter was accordingly referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ECF No. 19. Plaintiff failed to appear at the scheduling conference and failed to respond to the Court’s subsequent Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, the Court recommends this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. I. Background and Procedural History Plaintiff, represented by counsel at the time, commenced this action in California state court on June 30, 2022. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on July 5, 2022, and a second amended complaint (SAC) in September 2022. Defendant removed the action to this Court on January 20, 2023, on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.