Lau

Lau v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20252:24-cv-01202California3,640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL LAU, No. 2:24-cv-01202-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND, DENYING DEFENDANTS’

WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT, AND

REMANDING THIS ACTION TO THE

Defendants. BUTTE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT (Doc. Nos. 29, 30) 17 18 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to remand filed on October 15, 2024 and defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint filed on October 16, 2024. (Doc. Nos. 29, 30.) On October 23, 2024, the motions were taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 31.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion to remand and deny defendants’ motion to dismiss as moot. BACKGROUND On February 2, 2024, plaintiff Crystal Lau filed this discrimination action against her employer,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.