Haet

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTURO GOMEZ, No. 2:24-cv-2172-DC-CKD PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. DAVID HAET, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who proceeds in this action without counsel, filed his complaint on August 13, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) Before any action was taken on plaintiff’s case, however, it was reassigned from one district judge to another, and the order was served on plaintiff by mail. (ECF No. 3.) However, on October 22, 2024, the mail returned as undeliverable. On March 11, 2025, the undersigned directed plaintiff show cause within fourteen days as to his failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was specifically advised that failure to respond would result in dismissal of plaintiff’s claims under L.R. 183(b). (Id.) On March 24, 2025 the order served on plaintiff by mail was returned as undeliverable. Legal Standard Eastern District Local Rule 183(a) provides, in part: Any…