Picazo
Picazo v. Aptos Berry Farms, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 18 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICARDO PICAZO, DBA Salinas Farms, No. 24-2089
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:23-cv-02735-SVK v.
APTOS BERRY FARMS, MEMORANDUM*
INC.; DRISCOLL’S, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan G. Van Keulen, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 10, 2025 San Francisco, California*
Before: S. R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Ricardo Picazo (“Picazo”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims
against Aptos Berry Farms (“Aptos”) and Driscoll’s, Inc. (“Driscoll’s”) under
§ 499b(4) of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”). See
U.S.C. § 499b(4). Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. history of the case, we need not recount it here. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…