In re: Nestle Boost Nutritional Drink Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20253:21-cv-09812California5,181 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

23 Defendant markets and distributes Boost Glucose Control and Boost Glucose Control High 24 Protein. Plaintiffs challenge three statements that have appeared on Defendant’s labels during the 25 26 27 relevant period’: (1) “designed for people with diabetes”; (2) the name of the product (“Boost ’ Glucose Control”); and (3) “helps manage blood sugar” followed by an asterisk referring to ’ language on the back of the label stating “Clinically shown to produce a lower blood sugar || response vs. a standard nutritional drink in people with type 2 diabetes. Incorporate into a balanced diet as part of a medically supervised diabetes management plan. Not a substitute for medication.” (Dkt. Nos. 84-2 (bold in original); 84-3.)?> Examples of the front and back label statements are pictured below: Taal ee eR a —HELPS cattaee MA eNestie

MANAGE NES MANAGE. @ □□□□

BLOOD SUGAR* a < — 10…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.