Camran
Camran v. San Diego Youth Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARA CAMRAN, an individual, Case No.: 23-cv-00491-GPC-VET
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(b) SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES,
Defendant. [ECF Nos. 30, 35] 16 Plaintiff has filed what the Court construes as a motion to reconsider the Court’s denial of her previous motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b). See ECF No. 35. After the Court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment, ECF No. 29, Plaintiff responded by claiming that she did not know of her deadline to file 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 a reply brief,1 was not aware that the hearing on the motion had been vacated,2 and describing her disagreement with the Court’s order, see ECF No. 30. Now, Plaintiff again asks the Court to reconsider its final judgment and reopen the case, and states that her December 4, 2024 filing (ECF No. 30) contains the requisite papers to support this request. ECF…