(PC)Gould

(PC)Gould v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20251:24-cv-00699California2,078 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID GOULD, No. 1:24-cv-00699 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING WITH MODIFICATIONS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

COUNTY OF FRESNO, (Docs. 11, 20)

Defendant.

16 Plaintiff, a civil detainee under the Sexually Violent Predator Act, Cal. Welfare & Institutions Code § 6600, et seq., is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action concerning conditions he experienced while confined at the Fresno County Jail between approximately January 21, 2020, and October 2021. Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint on June 14, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On November 25, 2024, Defendant moved to dismiss on statute of limitations grounds. (Doc. 11.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations to deny Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. 20.) The Court served the Findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.