Commure, Inc. v. Canopy Works, Inc.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20255:24-cv-02592California3,351 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 COMMURE, INC., Case No. 24-cv-02592-NW (VKD)
Plaintiff, REDACTED
v. ORDER RE COUTERCLAIM-
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
CANOPY WORKS, INC., et al., CANOPY'S TRADE SECRET
IDENTIFICATION AND FOR STAY OF
Defendants. DISCOVERY AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS Re: Dkt. No. 117
14 Plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Commure, Inc. (“Commure”) together with counterclaim-defendants Athelas, Inc., Tanay Tandon, and Dhruv Parthasarathy1 move for an order striking defendant and counterclaim-plaintiff Canopy Works, Inc.’s (“Canopy”) identification of trade secrets. Dkt. No. 117. In addition, Commure requests an order staying trade secret-related discovery until Canopy identifies its trade secrets as required by California Civil Code § 2109.210. Id. Canopy opposes the motion to strike and the request for a stay of discovery. Dkt. No. 140. The Court…