Theresa Brooke v. Ennerdale Oxnard LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:25-cv-03316-MEMF-PD THERESA BROOKE,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

ENNERDALE OXNARD LLC,

15 Defendant.

On April 15, 2025, Theresa Brooke filed a Complaint against Ennerdale Oxnard LLC,

asserting: (1) a claim for declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as costs and attorney’s fees, arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages in the amount of $4,000, as well as declaratory judgment, injunction, costs, and attorney’s fees, pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq. Id. at ¶¶ 16–28. Principles of pendent jurisdiction have been codified in the supplemental jurisdiction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1367. The supplemental…