Padilla

Padilla v. Immigration

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20251:25-cv-00221California321 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN COVARRUBIAS PADILLA, Case No. 1:25-cv-00221 JLT EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE

v. ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, AND

DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

IMMIGRATION, et al., CLOSE THIS CASE Defendants. (Doc. 12) 16 Juan Covarrubias alleges a conspiracy by defendants to cause him harm, including assertions that devices were implanted inside his body. (See generally Doc. 1.) On February 27, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge found plaintiff’s allegations to be frivolous and recommended dismissing the case with prejudice and without leave to amend. (Doc. 12 at 5.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 30 days. (Id.) The Court advised plaintiff that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id. at 6, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.